Ascending The Globe Series: Part 1(Pillar 3 section): A Revelation for Mankind By Edward D.R. James
Pillar Three: The Culture of Transparency and Sharing—Open Patents, Sources, Information…Open Everything…along with the Free Public Neutral Internet
The simple reason our world is in “this” predicament, has much to do with the unabated culture of selfishness we’ve all been stomaching. Ergo, we are long overdue for a correction of epic proportions; and just as easy to see—our saving grace demands a sharing atmosphere. It makes sense for the pendulum to swing back the other direction, only to maintain an acceptable range of balance—not to swing the pendulum carelessly to the opposite end; where we lose the rational benefit of incentives, or the hive mind and homogeny creates a deficit of individuality. No, such an extreme would likewise be an err in judgement. The objective for the RM, if you would so allow, is to strike a chord in each of you to rebuild this culture of sharing…to draft the framework that will temper our vices…to consolidate our diverse pool of resources, talents, advantages, and efforts toward acceptable ranges imperative for both safety-nets and incentives…to redefine our highest standards of living…and to further amend our constitutions toward reconciling the biases, ill-conditions, and challenges plaguing our current time in history—as our founding fathers and mothers charged us to do.
In retrospect, let’s look at the tax bill for example. To increase transparency, it should have programed the guidelines of the proposed tax bill into the formula used to calculate our actual taxes. Then allow us to back test these bills, such that each individual (or household) can logon to their own IRS online account, and transpose the tax returns of prior years’ onto any newly proposed tax bill, then generate each of our projected tax returns. So if a tax bill has certain beneficial rates falling off after 10 years, the software should project calculations 20 years out for good measure. The program should include the projected decrease in tax revenues for all the tax breaks given to the wealthy throughout those 20 years. The program should compare the 20 year projections of all proposed tax bill and the current taxation formula, as a type of control or baseline. Of course all proposed bills, not just limited to tax bills, should go through the same rigorous format; thus providing the people with a transparent model to compare the various bills introduced into congress. As good as the Congressional Budget Office is, individual hearts and minds of citizens, however, can better be convinced by going online themselves, and plugging in figures that directly involve their own individual and household budgets.
This culture for transparency and sharing will be so open, that congress will not be allowed to vote on any proposed bill, outside of an emergency, unless we the people first get our just review of those bills. And because we will place a premium on transparency, balancing the view points, and deliberating our positions; ultimately, we will better grasp the goal of becoming the best informed voters we can be; making the best decisions for our individual selves and our families. In this way, we adhere to core Libertarian values, which the Revelation Model will preserve.
Libertarians will be able to weigh-in on the details of auditing this system and assess its performance to keep our private information out of public view. Additionally, it will be up to the individual as to whether or not certain private information will remain private, or be shared with the public domain; such as a music software analyzing pools of its subscribers to generate a list of recommended songs unique to a user, or a computer virus protection program analyzing various threats from its subscribers for better defensive measures to eventually update their software with. Information will be used to improve the lives of the public at-large; no longer will it be mined for a coterie of profiteers.
Certainly, the voters must discuss and decide on the details of discerning private information to use for the public good. To get an idea of how to even begin this debate, we need to agree on a baseline of exactly how current information is being managed. Therefore, all businesses and organizations must drop the legal-ese in their terms and conditions agreement, and educate the masses on their practices and the specifics of how our information is being stored and used; including how these organizations are currently benefiting from it. Again, full disclosure will be rewarded handsomely; and regardless of the corporate media’s spin, whistleblowers like Edward Snowden do spark an essential debate and discussion on how we can best indemnify society from the follies of pseudo-security measures, externalities, cover-ups, and the blood of corporate liabilities partially washed away by the tepid waters enforcing legislation. Once we control the money system, we can effectively encourage full disclosure, and the optimal utility of information and patents—bringing into reality the much anticipated culture of sharing, wisdom, and compassion.
These virtues, ever present with our founding fathers, shining brightly as the constellations, guiding our integrity’s true north, is evidenced in the spirit of their writ…
In 1742, after inventing an open stove to better warm the room, then publishing its details in a pamphlet, Founding Father Benjamin Franklin wrote in his autobiography, “Gov’r. Thomas was so pleas’d with the construction of this stove, as described in it, that he offered to give me a patent for the sole vending of them for a term of years; but I declin’d it from a principle which has ever weighed with me on such occasions, viz., That, as we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and this we should do freely and generously. An ironmonger in London however, assuming a good deal of my pamphlet, and working it up into his own, and making some small changes in the machine, which rather hurt its operation, got a patent for it there, and made, as I was told, a little fortune by it. And this is not the only instance of patents taken out for my inventions by others, tho’ not always with the same success, which I never contested, as having no desire of profiting by patents myself, and hating disputes. The use of these fireplaces in very many houses, both of this and the neighbouring colonies, has been, and is, a great saving of wood to the inhabitants.”[xliv]
On August 13, 1813, decades after he served as our First Secretary of State leading the Patent Review Board from 1790 to 1793, and after he served as our Third President, Founding Father Thomas Jefferson wrote back to Isaac McPherson, a Baltimore miller and manufacturer, in response to his letter regarding patents. The University of Chicago Press published this reply letter where Jefferson states,”…He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me. That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation. Inventions then cannot, in nature, be a subject of property. Society may give an exclusive right to the profits arising from them, as an encouragement to men to pursue ideas which may produce utility, but this may or may not be done, according to the will and convenience of the society, without claim or complaint from anybody. Accordingly, it is a fact, as far as I am informed, that England was, until we copied her, the only country on earth which ever, by a general law, gave a legal right to the exclusive use of an idea. In some other countries it is sometimes done, in a great case, and by a special and personal act, but, generally speaking, other nations have thought that these monopolies produce more embarrassment than advantage to society; and it may be observed that the nations which refuse monopolies of invention, are as fruitful as England in new and useful devices…”[xlv]
Jefferson, the first to purely interpret the authority to examine patents, was noted for his strict manner in granting them; leaving many applications for patents without exception to the nature of commerce and the sharing of ideas. Juxtapose the sophistries of a patent system alive today; the stark contrast alone suggests a new order gone mad. Now we bear witness to the innovations of the elite devolved into: frivolous patent trolling schemes, financial vehicles they typically park in tax shelters, investments for corporations disguised as campaign donations (no doubt to unite citizens against their own interests), teams of lobbyists and lawyers writing legislation to protect and proliferate the bottom-line of the filthy rich. The current capitalism is a hoarder’s paradise paralyzing gapers–on looking severe inequality worldwide. Another innovation is to suppress beneficial information: banks cook the books, tobaccos are cancerous crooks, big pharma rigs their data, vaccines have been empirical autism machines, GMO food gives your DNA attitude, low-cost auto safety violations are equivalent to deregulation, the Military Industrial Complex speaks for itself, Marco Rubio sabotaged the calculations of Obamacare which elevated premiums and deductibles into a nightmare. How about innovations where established companies suddenly change their names then transfer their liabilities and externalities onto taxpayers like you and me? Or innovate municipal and individual taxpayer restrictions from having the same bankruptcy protections as corporations? Do these innovations warrant enough American pride, to send our children into war, and protect the Establishment’s lie?
Although I believe our convictions for a culture of sharing, openness, and transparency will eventually lead the way to free energy; which will undoubtedly free us from the scourge of pollution and climate change, free ourselves from the tar pits of “war for oil”; perhaps the one of the greatest crimes against humanity is suppressing technologies and innovations that would have freed us from the addiction to fossil fuels. Confessions of a complex of interest needing to prop up the petrodollar, as the type of meddling, fueling the hitman’s terror, flames the horseman’s eye for war—terror with anti-terror…both reflections one in the same off this black liquid mirror.
In an interview a few years back, David Wilcock, author of The Source Field Investigations, referred to the Federation of American Scientists and said, “There’s been over 5,000 patents that were classified for National Security, and this includes automatically, any patent that gets above 70% efficiency in converting energy is automatically classified. So what that means is anybody who invents anything that could challenge oil—you will never see. And all that stuff needs to be released.”
On October of 2016 the Federation of American Scientists published an article that stated, “There were 5,680 invention secrecy orders in effect at the end of Fiscal Year 2016. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office reported that 121 new secrecy orders were issued in 2016, but also that 20 existing orders were rescinded, for a net increase of 101 over the year before. The latest figures were released under the Freedom of Information Act. The government may impose a ‘secrecy order’ on a patent application under the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 if it believes that disclosure of the underlying invention would be ‘detrimental to national security.’ Under those circumstances, a patent is withheld and the inventor is prohibited from revealing the invention unless and until the secrecy order is withdrawn.”[xlvi]
Clearly the culture of sharing for the greater good is somewhat fading into a lost art; acquiescing its stead to the corporate-commercial culture of self-aggrandizement. I suppose, greed can be characterized as a type of psychosis where guilt is lobotomized from the “embarrassment of riches”…and not to be out done by other inmates of the asylum stricken with the same disorder. This departure gives rise to the requisite that “holding society first” must amass a resounding force of resilience; a solid base to rein back the loosened patent laws that allow the establishments’ lust for power to calcify.
Only when we reform the privileges of intellectual property into a system that rights the wrongs of our past, can we begin our journey toward reconciliation, healing, and peace. Such a reform, devoted to the strengthening of our union, moved by the assemblage of her people, is inextricable to the security of our nation—despite any attempts, from whom President Eisenhower referred to as the “Military Industrial Complex (MIC)”, to suggest it as otherwise. Using innovation and information to advance society under our terms is not detrimental, in fact, it ensures our national security.
Not to paint too rosy a picture, a potential caveat looming ahead of this road, is having to strike a deal with the “Establishment” and those hiding in the shadows of government, to release the over 5, 000 secrecy orders and thousands of other private corporate patents that would better all of humanity. At first, paving a “non-detrimental” pathway for the cabal may seem nauseating; however, the medicinal relief of pragmatism is time-released to favor all of mankind. That being said, our best hand at the negotiating table can only be played by first exploring and enacting the pillars of the Revelation Model.
So how would it look like, if we were to reform the patent system under the RM?
Well I may be biased; however, I do believe it would resemble what our Founding Fathers Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin had envisioned as the natural order of patents. New intellectual properties of elements, processes, and products can quickly be applied to the products of others…unrestricted. Each competitive interest can build on the successes of one another, such that inventories of products and services can be improved upon in a flash. The Universal Single Payer will disburse royalties to the patent holder based on the successes of the patent user (or licensee), such that the more one’s patent is used and copied with high levels of performance, the more the patent holder will be paid not by the patent user (or licensee), but again by the Universal Single Payer. Independently, the Universal Single Payer will compensate the patent user (or licensee) for the successes of their product and service, undiminished for having used someone else’s patents.
Of course this kind of open patent system will be “the breath of life” for pillar one’s Supply-Demand-Resupply Inventory Network. The success of this inventory is dependent on our new economic paradigm for sharing information and ideas, as well as other pillars of the Revelation Model; quite simply put “No Sharing—No Inventory.” I do believe, though, that overcoming the “Establishment” will require part, if not all, the pillars of the RM…giving me hope, fueling my optimism, and sustaining my vigor to press forward the banners of victory for all the peoples of humanity. One day, our culture will be so adept at sharing that all computer languages from all information systems, from all business models will be able to network-with and audit the same inventory; such that ordering any product and service will be almost as convenient as the thought itself.
Although, the culture of sharing spans far and wide, across multitudes of aspects in varying degrees, the overarching theme, the spirit that bridges all our individual experiences and interests together into one collective hub…is transparency. Fully disclosed, transparency is light and truth—the alpha and the omega—however, we humans have had a history of blocking, bending, and blurring the light. The following examples highlight some of these ill-usions.
In Josh Fox’s “lit” documentary Gasland, Josh reported that, “In 2004, the Environmental Protection Agency was investigating water contamination incidences due to hydraulic fracturing (or fracking) across the country, but a panel rejected the inquiry stating that although hazardous materials were being injected underground the EPA did not need to investigate. Weston Wilson, a 20 year veteran of the EPA (not speaking on behalf of the EPA) wrote a letter to congress objecting. He also noted that on the peer review panel that authored the report, five of the seven members appeared to have conflicts-of-interest, and would benefit from the EPA’s decision not to conduct a further investigation.” During the interview Weston said, “They came out with the patently ridiculous conclusion—they had showed it was toxic and then said it wasn’t a risk. It made no sense, and only in an Orwellian world would you accept that.” Josh continued, “From 1995 until 2000 (when he became Vice President), Dick Cheney was the CEO of Halliburton. One of the first things he did when he became Vice President was to form what was known as the Energy Task Force. They met up to 40 times with industry leaders. They only met only once with members from environmental groups. The Energy Task Force and a hundred million dollar lobbying effort on behalf of the industry were significant in the passage of what’s called the “Halliburton Loophole” to the Safe Drinking Water Act; which authorizes oil and gas drillers exclusively, to inject known hazardous materials unchecked directly into or adjacent to underground drinking water supplies. It passed as a part of the Bush Administration’s Energy Policy Act of 2005.”5
Later Weston remarked sarcastically, “When the President says to its bureaucracy—‘don’t investigate’—‘expedite things for industry’—we do those jobs well too. One can characterize this entire industry as having a hundred years of history of purchasing those they contaminate. So, they purchase the land and often with an agreement of secrecy of somebody that’s alleging they’ve been contaminated by oil and gas production. The industry itself has that type of practice…so, the onus should be on the industry to prove to the government that their practice is benign and not that assumption…Even if they [the allegations] weren’t true they deserve an investigation, they’re citizens of the United States. And they certainly don’t deserve to be exposed to secret chemicals—it’s un-American. So, I understand your question and your frustration, and you’re seeing how this may be a pattern repeating itself, but so far we’re not on duty. We’re not present as a government agency to answer your legitimate questions, and we must be directed to.”5
Then Josh interviewed the highly acclaimed Environmental Health Analyst, Dr. Theo Colborn, who said, “We’ve begun to look at what’s being used to drill a well—data the government should be collecting but isn’t collecting, we’ve been able to get our hands on some of that.” Josh summarized, “because of their exemptions, fracking chemicals are considered proprietary, like the special sauce for a Big Mac, or the secret formula for Coke-a-Cola. The only reason we know anything about the fracking chemicals is because of the work of Theo Colborn. By chasing down trucks, combing through material safety data sheets, and collecting samples, Theo has identified 596 different chemicals in 900 chemical products.” “Every environment law we wrote to protect public health is ignored, but the neurological effects are very insidious,” Dr. Colborn revealed as she continued, “at first you may just have headaches, the next thing you might have ringing in your ears, or you may be a little disoriented, or you may feel a little dizzy, but eventually you may feel what is called peripheral neuropathy, and when you get to this stage you have irreversible brain damage. You may begin to get swelling—your extremities, especially in the arms and legs, and never know where the pain is going to be. The pain can be excruciating. Think about the workers, or the people whose yards are within a thousand feet of their home—have a well pad—they’re inhaling these chemicals 24/7, around the clock. I go out and I talk to the bosses, you know the men who are overlooking what’s going on, and even their supervisors, the public relation people that talk to us from the industry—they are so surprised, they look at me as if I’m crazy when I ask them, ‘what are they mixing in the chemicals right now?’—‘Oh we’re not using any chemicals; well if we are they’re safe’. Even the bosses don’t know what they’re telling those men to handle. Once the public hears the story, and they’ll say well why aren’t we out there monitoring? We can’t monitor, until we know what they’re using there’s no way to monitor. You can’t!”5
The current obsolete model drapes a shroud of secrecy over its profits, its interests, and over the unsuspecting, faithful eyes of its victims. Similarly, profit based and budget based operations are somewhat mirror images of one another, since both require bank financing to expand their services when customer sales, rents, tax revenues, issuing shares, and existing bonds aren’t enough. So when cases surface from municipal budgetary restrictions, adorning the public with a veil of ignorance cloaks her view, as well as her bliss…
A Chicago Tribune article published in August 2011 stated, “City officials were prompted to start testing for the substances after the Tribune found trace amounts of pharmaceuticals, residue from personal care products, and unregulated industrial chemicals in local tap water. Substances found in the city’s latest tests include the sex hormones testosterone and progesterone; gemfibrozil, a prescription cholesterol-fighting drug; and DEET, the active ingredient in bug spray. The tests also found perfluorooctane sulfonate, an ingredient in Scotchgard stain-fighting coatings; bisphenol A, a hormone-like plastics additive; and tris (2-butoxyethyl) phosphate, a flame retardant chemical…
Little is known about potential health effects from drinking drug-contaminated water, but scientists and regulators increasingly are concerned about long-term exposure, even at very low levels. ‘We need to start addressing the cumulative effects that these low-dose exposures could be having on people,’ said Thomas Burke, associate dean of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. ‘There are no quick solutions,’ said Burke, who chaired a National Academy of Sciences committee that called for a dramatic overhaul of the way the U.S. regulates toxic chemicals. ‘But we need a new approach that is more responsive to emerging science’…
‘Exposure to some of these chemicals … is cause for consternation for people and concern over fish and wildlife impacts,’ said Rebecca Klaper, a researcher at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee who studies the Great Lakes…
The EPA’s position is that it doesn’t yet have enough evidence to limit pharmaceuticals and many other unregulated chemicals in drinking water. Water officials say not enough is known to justify spending millions of taxpayer dollars to upgrade treatment plants.”[xlvii]
In contrast, the RM’s objectives for transparency and improving society will justify the funding needed to study the long term effects of these low levels toxins, as well as the funding needed to immediately upgrade our water treatment plants. Laborers in the energy sector, as I alluded to earlier, will have complete health and economic protection as they seal and secure the gas and oil wells. Afterwards, they’ll have the freedom to choose and begin training on other vocations that improve the trends for a safer, more sustainable world.
Curing all symptoms brought on by the systemic cancer, that is this current economic experiment “run-a-muck”, is no easy task. Two ill-addressed industries in particular are contributing to untold catastrophic levels of harm…they are the food and drug industries; which is ironic because the father of medicine, Hippocrates, who’s Oath abstains from doing harm, has been quoted as saying, “Let food be thy medicine, and medicine be thy food.”
A farmer, Joel Salatin, of Polyface Farms, boldly summarized the American system in the Oscar-nominated documentary “Food, Inc.” Salatin, said “we’re willing to subsidize the food system to create the mystique of cheap food, when actually it’s very expensive food when you add up the environmental cost, societal costs, health costs…the industrial food is not honest food, it’s not priced honestly, it’s not produced honestly, it’s not processed honestly, there’s nothing honest about that food.”[xlviii]
For a more in-depth analysis, here are some excerpts from a brilliant, February 1999 article published in The Chronicle of Higher Education, entitled: Patents on Cells, Genes, and Organisms Undermine the Exchange of Scientific Ideas—“…An unforeseen and deeply troubling aspect of this commercialization, however, is the transformation of biological entities — the products of hundreds of millions of years of evolution — into private property. This is taking place through a radical extension of patent law to encompass gene sequences, isolated cells and tissues, genetically engineered animals, and even natural species….
Furthermore, in spite of widespread opposition to such “life patents” in many other countries, the U.S. government, in response to pressures from corporations in the United States, is seeking to force all countries to accept U.S.-style patent laws. For example, the government threatened to end science and technology agreements with India, unless the Indian patent laws were extended to cover pharmaceutical and agricultural products. For instance, Monsanto owns a patent covering all genetically engineered cotton, and Duke University has patented genes involved in Alzheimer’s disease. Human Genome Sciences has patented the entire genomes of certain bacteria that can cause serious diseases in humans, to gain a monopoly on the development of new antibacterial agents. Myriad Genetics owns patents on the human genes that, when damaged, lead to breast cancer. And Axys Pharmaceuticals has applied for patents on the cells and genes of New Guinea tribes, for their presumed value in the development of certain treatments against viruses to which the tribes may have developed immunities….
U.S. law permits the owner of a patent to prevent others from using or benefiting from the subject of the patent, without the owner’s permission, for 20 years. After that time, the patented material enters the public domain. However, it is common for patent holders to modify their inventions and apply for additional patents…
This 200-year-old legacy was breached in 1980 when the Supreme Court ruled, in Diamond v. Chakrabarty, that an applicant could patent a genetically engineered bacterium. The court’s decision was very close (four of the nine justices dissented from the majority’s opinion), and it was narrowly written to apply only to genetically modified microorganisms. However, since the decision, under pressure from pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and agro-technology companies, the patent office has issued patents on plants, animals, genes, and human cell lines…Patent laws are passed, modified, and superseded by Congress just as other laws are. They are means to social progress, not an end in themselves. Congress should amend the existing patent laws to explicitly exclude life patents…
The life patents already granted threaten to obstruct scientific and technological research. The biotechnology revolution in the United States was the product of research — most of it sponsored by the federal government since World War II — at colleges, universities, and medical schools throughout the nation. The free communication and exchange of materials and ideas were essential to that research. Scientists readily communicated major advances, such as the determination of the amino-acid sequences that make up protein chains — information that any scientist could use in future research. The enormous inventiveness of that period flourished without patent protections granted to individuals or companies.
Now that life patents are being awarded, however, patent attorneys regularly advise researchers to limit what they tell their colleagues about their work before they apply for a patent…
Life patents may also interfere with the delivery of health care. Patent monopolies lead to higher costs for drugs and treatments, which price them out of many patients’ reach. And they retard the development of products that are more efficient and cost less. For example, Genentech has repeatedly charged other companies with patent infringement when they have produced more-sophisticated forms of a clot-dissolving protein patented by Genentech…
Healthy competition is particularly at risk in the seed industry. Patents on plants deprive farmers of free access to an essential public resource — crop seed. Farmers for millennia have saved the seed of their harvests for replanting the following year, and they continue to do so even in the industrialized agricultural systems of the United States. Patents on seeds are a legal means to make sure farmers buy seed every year. Since the Monsanto Corporation began marketing genetically engineered cotton and soybeans, it has investigated 475 farmers suspected of saving seed from the patented plants. Some of the farmers who were found to have violated patents have had to pay Monsanto tens of thousands of dollars each…
The U.S. government and the United Nations have recognized the necessity of protecting essential common resources — such as the oceans, the atmosphere, and the moon — from national sovereignty or private ownership. Surely the earth’s life forms should be in the same category.”[xlix]
Although that article was published almost 20 years ago in 1999, its message holds relevant and true…today!
The “Food, Inc.” documentary also included an interview with the author, journalist, activist, and a previous UC Berkeley professor of journalism, Michael Pollan, who claimed, “there has been this revolving door between Monsanto’s corporate offices and the various regulatory and judicial bodies that have made the keys decisions…Justice Clarence Thomas was a Monsanto attorney…Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the Majority of opinion, in a case that allowed these companies to prevent these farmers from saving their own seed. Monsanto had very close ties to the Bush administration (Donald Rumsfeld, Searle Pharmaceuticals CEO bought by Monsanto/ Missouri Senator John Ashcroft received record donations from Monsanto) and the Clinton administration (Mickey Kantor, Monsanto Board of Directors / Robert Shapiro, Monsanto CEO-Pres. Clinton’s Advisory Board).” 48
The video touched on other topics stating, “It is incredible that the FDA wants to allow the sale of meat from cloned animals without further research, but also wants to allow the sale of this meat without any labels. These companies fight tooth and nail against labeling. The fast food industry fought against giving you the calorie information, they fought against telling you if there’s trans-fat in your food. The meat packing industry for years prevented the country of origin labeling, they fought not to label Genetically Modified Foods; and now 78% of processed food in the supermarket has some genetically modified ingredient…
Michael Pollan claimed that we’ve had a food system that’s been dedicated to a single virtue of efficiency (not diversity), so we grow a very small number of crops, with a very small number of variety, a very small number of companies, now even though you achieve efficiencies, the system gets more and more precarious [highlighting the jeopardy of monoculture]. You will have a breakdown eventually. And where the breakdown comes in this system you don’t always know…
Modern production agriculture depends on large amounts of petroleum. One farmer says his farm uses about 40,000 gallons of diesel a year…We eat a lot of oil without knowing it. To bring the steer to slaughter you use about 75 gallons of oil…[In the quest for a solution] as another farmer put it, ‘People have got to start demanding good wholesome food with us and we’ll deliver, I promise you, we’re very ingenious people. We’ll deliver.”48
Under the RM’s culture for sharing and transparency, not only will we cease and desist all corporate practices of capturing its regulators, we will use any and all resources to open up patents: from providing incentives, to rolling back policies, to repealing and replacing—whatever it takes, we’ll do it. So to the food and drug industries—“You’re all on Notice!” Any corporation’s hegemony over life patents and seeds will themselves be terminated. No longer will the monopolization and monoculture of our food supply be permitted. As a matter of fact, we’re bringing back the public seed planting programs. So all you farmers out there get ready—and “Fire up them Seed Cleaners!”
At the end of the day, whether you are society’s “salt of the earth”, or an “A-list Superstar”, the RM will reconcile your grievances. For instance, Robert De Niro’s plea to investigate why so many people claim their children were diagnosed with autism after getting vaccinated—will be honored. Jon and Tracey Stewart’s encouragement of Farm Sanctuaries, Beyoncé’s “Flawless” Chime For Change campaign to promote female empowerment, Bono and U2’s pledge to end poverty, Ted Danson’s passion to curb climate change, George Clooney’s charity work to stop human rights atrocities in Darfur, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s humanitarian work from assisting orphans around the world, HIV patients in Africa, refugees in the middle east, to hurricane victims in Louisiana—entertainers and sports phenomes alike—their entire wish list to make the world a better place will be revisited and addressed with the Revelation Model’s leverage for economic and political change.
In Closing:
As both global and national citizens, we know all too well—This Current System and its Culture are Obsolete! If we stay shackled, on our knees working for this economic experiment, then the probability of timelines can only frame doomsday-like scenarios similar to the movie “Mad Max” …all this in a relatively short amount of time, perhaps 30 to 60 years. This injustice is unacceptable—Enough is Enough! We must double and triple our efforts—Peacefully…Peacefully Protesting, Demanding our Referendums be Met, and Calling for a Global Convention!
Ultimately, our culture supported by the pillars of the Revelation Model, will allow us to heal the traumas woven with the strands of our DNA into the exquisite tapestry that is our beloved human history. The Revelation Model will spin the wheels of reconciliation, remove the blockages of karma, and guide the generations and our collective soul to live within the most optimal timeline.
The first three of these Pillars being:
Pillar One: The Resource Oriented Economy to Peg our Currencies with; and the Supply-Demand-Resupply Inventory Network as the Job Creator
Pillar Two: The People’s Power over Money and Credit—using Public Banks along with the Universal Single Payer system to Compensate Us All
Pillar Three: The Culture of Transparency and Sharing—Open Patents, Sources, Information…Open Everything…along with the Free Public Neutral Internet
We’ll first initiate the Resource Oriented Economy with a financial stimulus of the People’s Money, from “zero interest” loans via the nationwide creation of Public Banks. Then, everyone will collaborate in tandem to construct the Supply-Demand-Resupply Inventory Network via the transparency and the sharing of information. We will receive income from the Universal Single Payer system through our public banks’ usage of the People’s financial stimulus.
I hope and pray that by envisioning these pillars working in concert, you will dream of a brighter tomorrow…that you will hold the brilliance of that light to anchor and become the New Heaven and the New Earth, our holy scriptures once prophesied. By having the proper incentives to open our patents, share our ideas, and peer-review our combined data and methods for best practices, we will hone in and become: better decision makers…thus, better informed voters…better workers in better health…better adjusted to our diverse wealth. To each of us, our joyful ends…justified by over-joyous societal means. This promise land…this golden age for all of man…is much closer than it seems.
This revelation—I share with you. Should it call to you as it does to me—then, in kind, share this message to all in your light, with whomever you may be. Peace be with you.
Final Statement:
As solid as these three pillars are, they alone are not enough to stabilize and fulfill the new era for humanity. There are still many questions to be answered: How to distribute goods and services in a way that we preserve the strengths of capitalism and avoid the pitfalls of socialism? How to responsibly transition into the new economy, such that the winners of those who enjoy today’s lion’s share can, likewise, have a successful transition? Even if the Resource Oriented Economy could temper inflation, how will we prevent hyper-austerity? How should America regard and respond to China’s petro-yuan and the one belt one road campaign, in a manner that will take any covert option of war off the table?
Become familiar with the Revelation Model, and join me in the coming videos/articles…as I will address all these questions and more.
Thank You Very Much for watching this extensive video! Certainly, future videos will be much more brief. If you really love what you’ve heard so far—Please “share”, “subscribe” to, and “like” this video. Add this to your playlist, checkout my “Playlist”, and share some of your videos with me. Last thing—Please translate this video to other languages—And Spread the Word, like Gospel! By Ascending the Cultural of Economics and Politics, We’ll be Ascending The Globe as One. One World-One Love, Baby!
